![]() Now the software is banned from use by city bureaus and extremely limiting the manner in which they’re used by private businesses. įacial recognition technology has been a topic of heated debate when it pertains to citizens’ rights to privacy and now Portland is among the cities pushing back against said tech. Portland has passed the strictest ban on facial recognition technology in the nation, barring the use of the software by city bureaus and restricting its use by private businesses. The FBI has two facial recognition programs in its Criminal Justice Information Services (CJIS) Division the Next Generation Identification (NGI) System and the Facial Analysis, Comparison, and Evaluation (FACE) Services Unit, according to congressional testimony in 2019 which can only be used for open-source investigations and internal assessments, according to Jake Laperruque, senior counsel at the Project for Government Oversight.PORTLAND, OR – The Portland City Council recently passed a ban on specified uses of facial recognition technology across the city – and this ban happens to the strictest ban ever enacted within the nation. CEO of TrueFace, Shaun Moore says that videos from the riot could also be used to extract high-confidence identification. Law enforcement officials are needing to depend on the FBI’s technology to identify criminals via the many videos, images and other digital “fingerprints” in combination with open-source information. The Bureau also runs a Combined DNA Index System (CODIS) biometric database. In response to last week’s riot, FedScoop reports the FBI has set up a portal where the public can submit videos and images that can be used to track down individuals who took part. “But by and large, there are still no laws governing how and when this technology can be used, and who can run searches for whom.” “We’ve seen a lot of efforts in various parts of the country to bring face recognition under control,” she said. Though the company has released new compliance features aimed at preventing abuse of the technology, some are still skeptical.Ĭlare Garvie, a researcher who studies facial recognition at the Center on Privacy and Technology at Georgetown Law, highlights the lack of regulation surrounding the use of facial recognition software. ![]() law enforcement agencies, according to the company. ![]() through the collection of information and images without the individual’s consent.Ĭlearview has a database of over 3 billion photos retrieved from all over the web (Ton-That maintains that the data which Clearview retrieves is already public) in use by approximately 2,400 U.S. The American Civil Liberties Union has previously raised concern with Clearview’s privacy policies, which, the ACLU states, violate various laws in the U.S. Webb said he would only forward information to the FBI that was accompanied by a name or other identifiers, such as online profiles. “And I’m still working on continuing to forward leads to my point of contact with the FBI.” Jason Webb, a police officer for Oxford, who has been finding photo matches from the riots using Clearview. “I was able to develop…some pretty good suspect leads, and forwarded those,” said Sgt.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |